top of page
  • Writer's pictureHannah Hamilton

"The OpenAI Debacle: A Case Study in the Need for Trauma-Informed Decision-Making"

The recent debacle at OpenAI, characterized by the firing of CEO Sam Altman and the subsequent mass revolt by employees, serves as a stark illustration of the consequences of overlooking trauma-informed care principles within an organization. Given the limited information available (which itself is part of the problem), much about the situation at OpenAI remains unclear. However, what we do know reflects a significant lack of trauma-informed decision-making.

OpenAI underwent a substantial crisis marked by the board’s abrupt dismissal of CEO Sam Altman under opaque circumstances. In response, over 500 employees united in a letter demanding the board's resignation and Altman's reinstatement, expressing a profound lack of confidence in the board's competence and threatening to resign themselves. This turmoil ultimately led to three board members being fired, Sam Altman's reinstatement, and the establishment of a new board. These events highlight the critical importance of integrating trauma-informed care principles into organizational decision-making processes.

Trauma-informed philosophy has multiple facets and OpenAI’s Board made many mistakes.

1. Safety

- Lack of Psychological Safety: The sudden firing of CEO Sam Altman created a sense of instability and uncertainty among employees, jeopardizing their psychological safety.

- Trauma-Informed Approach: A trauma-informed board prioritizes creating a safe and stable environment. Open communication about leadership changes and clear explanations mitigate perceived threats.

2. Trustworthiness and Transparency

- Lack of Trust: The board's decision to oust Altman without communicating specific reasons eroded trust among employees, leading to a mass revolt. Due to the lack of transparency, employees understandably concluded that the board lacks competence, judgment, and care, casting doubt on the validity of the board’s decision

- Trauma-Informed Approach: Transparency is crucial. A trauma-informed board would have communicated openly about the reasons behind the decision, building trust through honesty and openness.

3. Peer Support

- Unity Through Revolt: Employees demonstrated unity by collectively signing letters and threatening to leave, fostering a sense of peer cohesiveness amid adversity. Had employees followed through on their threat to leave, OpenAI might have faced significant challenges in continuing its mission.

- Trauma-Informed Approach: Fostering a sense of community and support is essential. A trauma-informed board actively engages with employees during the transition and helps them rely on each other instead of feeling isolated and trauma-bonding.

4. Collaboration and Mutuality

- Disconnect in Leadership: The demand for the board's resignation highlights a breakdown in collaboration and mutual understanding between leadership and employees.

- Trauma-Informed Approach: Encouraging collaboration and mutual respect is vital. A trauma-informed board would involve employees in decision-making processes, ensuring a shared understanding of organizational goals. This is particularly significant considering our understanding of the events. OpenAI’s goal is a lofty one: ensure that general artificial intelligence benefits all of humanity. And it appears the board was trying to ensure this and it is reported most employees started working for OpenAI precisely for their mission statement. Had the board leaned on the mission statement with collaboration and transparency with employees, we may have had a different outcome.

5. Empowerment, Voice, and Choice

- Lack of Employee Empowerment: Prior to the firing, it seems that some employees felt empowered enough to send a letter to the board about some of their concerns about advancements with ChatGPT. Despite the availability of employee input, the board made a unilateral decision veiled in secrecy, leading to a loss of faith among employees

- Trauma-Informed Approach: Empowering employees by involving them in decision-making and acknowledging their concerns is key. A trauma-informed board would actively seek employee input, fostering a culture of shared responsibility.

6. Cultural, Historical, and Gender Issues

- Unexplored Factors: One concern about lack of trauma-informed decision-making impacts the board more than the organization: lack of diversity. Prior to the shake-up, two of the board members were female. Currently, there are none, and all board members are white. Sadly, the decisions made are perpetuating the socio-cultural trauma and oppression already in the corporate space.

- Trauma-Informed Approach: Acknowledging and addressing cultural, historical, and gender dynamics is essential for a trauma-informed organization. Diversity and inclusion should be at the forefront of decision-making processes and if it would have been considered, could have improved OpenAI’s board and future as an organization.

The OpenAI disaster serves as a valuable lesson in the importance of trauma-informed practices within organizations. By embracing the six aspects of trauma-informed care – safety, trustworthiness, peer support, collaboration, empowerment, and cultural considerations – the board could have navigated the situation differently, fostering a healthier and more resilient organizational culture. Looking ahead, organizations can draw valuable lessons from OpenAI's missteps and prioritize trauma-informed practices to safeguard the well-being and success of their teams.



bottom of page